Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding time functional improvements" » "coder coding time functional improvement" (Expand search), "coder coding time function improvement" (Expand search), "coder coding time functional movement" (Expand search), "coder coding time fractional improvements" (Expand search), "coder coding life functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder coding time function improvements" (Expand search), "modern coding time functional improvements" (Expand search), "color coding time functional improvements" (Expand search), "odor coding time functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder holding time functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder loading time functional improvements" (Expand search), "coder coding the functional improvements" (Expand search)
"api piton python python programming" » "api piton pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api piton pitons python programming" (Expand search), "api piton pytm python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api in python python programming" (Expand search), "api with python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding time functional improvements") OR ("api piton python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding time functional improvements\") OR (\"api piton python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding time functional improvements ) OR ( api piton python python programming ))*.