Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding string its coverage" » "coder coding using its coverage" (Expand search), "coder sewing string its coverage" (Expand search), "coder comparing string its coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding string its coverage" (Expand search), "color coding string its coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding string its coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding string in coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding string news coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding string cusp coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding sharing its coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding during its coverage" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding string its coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding string its coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding string its coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.