Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding sensing using coverage" » "coder coding using using coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding inserting using coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding sensing using average" (Expand search), "coder coding sensing testing coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding sensing funding coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding sensors using coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding sensor using coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding sensing using coverage" (Expand search), "color coding sensing using coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding sensing using coverage" (Expand search)
"in lines python python programming" » "in lines pythons python programming" (Expand search), "in lines piton python programming" (Expand search), "in lines pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in in python python programming" (Expand search), "in line python python programming" (Expand search), "in linear python python programming" (Expand search), "in life python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding sensing using coverage\") OR (\"in lines python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding sensing using coverage ) OR ( in lines python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding sensing using coverage") OR ("in lines python python programming"))*.