Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding robust logarithmic functions" » "coder coding robust logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding logistic logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder modeling robust logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder finding robust logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder using robust logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "modern coding robust logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "color coding robust logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "odor coding robust logarithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding robust logarithmic functions\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding robust logarithmic functions ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding robust logarithmic functions") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.