Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding prune algorithm parallelization" » "coder coding prune automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding prune algorithms parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding price algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding plane algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "modern coding prune algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "color coding prune algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "odor coding prune algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding rna algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding gene algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding frame algorithm parallelization" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding prune algorithm parallelization\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding prune algorithm parallelization ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding prune algorithm parallelization") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.