Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding programming loss function" » "coder solving programming loss function" (Expand search), "coder cone programming loss function" (Expand search), "coder conic programming loss function" (Expand search), "coder coding programming laws function" (Expand search), "coder coding programming luis function" (Expand search), "coder coding programming lmis function" (Expand search), "coder coding programming basis function" (Expand search), "coder coding programming cross functional" (Expand search), "modern coding programming loss function" (Expand search), "color coding programming loss function" (Expand search), "odor coding programming loss function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding programming loss function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding programming loss function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding programming loss function ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding programming loss function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.