Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding predict cognitive programming" » "coder coding predict copositive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding predict competitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding predict repetitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding predicts cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding predicting cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding prevents cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder coping predict cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder modeling predict cognitive programming" (Expand search), "coder forcing predict cognitive programming" (Expand search), "modern coding predict cognitive programming" (Expand search), "color coding predict cognitive programming" (Expand search), "odor coding predict cognitive programming" (Expand search)
"python using python python programming" » "python using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python using piton python programming" (Expand search), "python using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python usando python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding python python programming" (Expand search), "action using python python programming" (Expand search), "python in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding predict cognitive programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding predict cognitive programming\") OR (\"python using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding predict cognitive programming ) OR ( python using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding predict cognitive programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))*.