Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding on duplicated coverage" » "coder coding of duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding on duplicate coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding and duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding on duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "color coding on duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding on duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding in duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding an duplicated coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding on duplicated coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding on duplicated coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding on duplicated coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding on duplicated coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.