Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding mac logarithmic functions" » "coder coding mac logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding exact logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding dual logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding _ logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "modern coding mac logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "color coding mac logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "odor coding mac logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding vvc logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding an logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding at logarithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding mac logarithmic functions") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding mac logarithmic functions\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding mac logarithmic functions ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding mac logarithmic functions") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.