Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding lms logarithmic function" » "coder coding _ logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding and logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding the logarithmic function" (Expand search), "modern coding lms logarithmic function" (Expand search), "color coding lms logarithmic function" (Expand search), "odor coding lms logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding lpc logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding is logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding ts logarithmic function" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding lms logarithmic function\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding lms logarithmic function ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding lms logarithmic function") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.