Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding law logarithmic functions" » "coder coding law logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding new logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding dual logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding _ logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "modern coding law logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "color coding law logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "odor coding law logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder cooling law logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder costing law logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding an logarithmic functions" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding law logarithmic functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding law logarithmic functions\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding law logarithmic functions ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding law logarithmic functions") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.