Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding law logarithmic function" » "coder coding new logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding dual logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding _ logarithmic function" (Expand search), "modern coding law logarithmic function" (Expand search), "color coding law logarithmic function" (Expand search), "odor coding law logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder cooling law logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder costing law logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding an logarithmic function" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding law logarithmic function") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding law logarithmic function\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding law logarithmic function ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding law logarithmic function") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.