Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding is spent programming" » "coder coding is agent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding is set programming" (Expand search), "coder coding is end programming" (Expand search), "modern coding is spent programming" (Expand search), "color coding is spent programming" (Expand search), "odor coding is spent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding in spent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding ts spent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding its1 spent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding s spent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding is silent programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding is spent programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding is spent programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding is spent programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding is spent programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.