Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding is inefficiently coding" » "coder coding is efficient coding" (Expand search), "coder coding is efficient encoding" (Expand search), "coder coding is inefficient code" (Expand search), "coder coding is inefficient coding" (Expand search), "coder coding to efficiently coding" (Expand search), "coder coding is insufficient coding" (Expand search), "modern coding is inefficiently coding" (Expand search), "color coding is inefficiently coding" (Expand search), "odor coding is inefficiently coding" (Expand search), "coder coding in inefficiently coding" (Expand search), "coder coding ts inefficiently coding" (Expand search), "coder coding its1 inefficiently coding" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding is inefficiently coding\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding is inefficiently coding ) OR ( api python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding is inefficiently coding") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.