Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding insertions in coverage" » "coder coding inserting in coverage" (Expand search), "coder bodily insertions in coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding conventions in coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding insertion in coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding insertion of coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding insertion and coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding insertions in coverage" (Expand search), "color coding insertions in coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding insertions in coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding insertions and coverage" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding insertions in coverage") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding insertions in coverage\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding insertions in coverage ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding insertions in coverage") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.