Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding in recurrent example" » "coder coding in recent example" (Expand search), "coder coding in recurrent samples" (Expand search), "coder coding in recent examples" (Expand search), "modern coding in recurrent example" (Expand search), "color coding in recurrent example" (Expand search), "odor coding in recurrent example" (Expand search), "coder coding and recurrent example" (Expand search), "coder coding of recurrent example" (Expand search), "coder coding _ recurrent example" (Expand search), "coder coding rna recurrent example" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding in recurrent example") OR ("via python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding in recurrent example\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding in recurrent example ) OR ( via python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding in recurrent example") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.