Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding in inductive programming" » "coder coding in disjunctive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding in objective programming" (Expand search), "coder coding in reactive programming" (Expand search), "modern coding in inductive programming" (Expand search), "color coding in inductive programming" (Expand search), "odor coding in inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding an inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding in inductively programming" (Expand search), "coder coding and inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding rna inductive programming" (Expand search), "coder coding _ inductive programming" (Expand search)
"python using python python programming" » "python using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python using piton python programming" (Expand search), "python using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python usando python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding python python programming" (Expand search), "action using python python programming" (Expand search), "python in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding in inductive programming\") OR (\"python using python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding in inductive programming ) OR ( python using python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding in inductive programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))*.