Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding in implementation on" » "coder coding an implementation on" (Expand search), "coder coding on implementation on" (Expand search), "coder coding and implementation on" (Expand search), "coder coding in implementation of" (Expand search), "coder coding in implementation in" (Expand search), "coder coding in implementation and" (Expand search), "modern coding in implementation on" (Expand search), "color coding in implementation on" (Expand search), "odor coding in implementation on" (Expand search), "coder coding rna implementation on" (Expand search), "coder coding _ implementation on" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding in implementation on") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding in implementation on\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding in implementation on ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding in implementation on") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.