Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding in efficient programming" » "coder coding in efficient processing" (Expand search), "coder coding in fragment programming" (Expand search), "coder coding in different programming" (Expand search), "modern coding in efficient programming" (Expand search), "color coding in efficient programming" (Expand search), "odor coding in efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coding an efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coding on efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coding is efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coding rna efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coding and efficient programming" (Expand search), "coder coding _ efficient programming" (Expand search)
"on python python python programming" » "on pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "on piton python python programming" (Expand search), "on pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python pythin python programming" (Expand search), "of python pythof python programming" (Expand search), "_ python pyth_ python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding in efficient programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding in efficient programming\") OR (\"on python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding in efficient programming ) OR ( on python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding in efficient programming") OR ("on python python python programming"))*.