Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding in duplicated coverage" » "coder coding in duplicate coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding and duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding _ duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding in duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "color coding in duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding in duplicated coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding rna duplicated coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding in duplicated coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding in duplicated coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding in duplicated coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.