Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding in algorithmic parallelization" » "coder coding in algorithm parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding in algorithmic personalization" (Expand search), "coder coding in automatic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding an algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding on algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding and algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "modern coding in algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "color coding in algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "odor coding in algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding rna algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search), "coder coding _ algorithmic parallelization" (Expand search)
"nip in python python programming" » "nip in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "nip in piton python programming" (Expand search), "nip in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "nip _ python python programming" (Expand search), "unip in python python programming" (Expand search), "lip in python python programming" (Expand search), "hip in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding in algorithmic parallelization") OR ("nip in python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding in algorithmic parallelization\") OR (\"nip in python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding in algorithmic parallelization ) OR ( nip in python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding in algorithmic parallelization") OR ("nip in python python programming"))*.