Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding improving convolutional type" » "coder coding improving conventional type" (Expand search), "coder coding learning convolutional type" (Expand search), "coder coding varying convolutional type" (Expand search), "coder coding improving convolution type" (Expand search), "coder coding improving convolutional code" (Expand search), "coder boosting improving convolutional type" (Expand search), "coder codegen improving convolutional type" (Expand search), "coder coexist improving convolutional type" (Expand search), "modern coding improving convolutional type" (Expand search), "color coding improving convolutional type" (Expand search), "odor coding improving convolutional type" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding improving convolutional type\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding improving convolutional type ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding improving convolutional type") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.