Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding improving convolutional code" » "coder coding improving conventional code" (Expand search), "coder coding learning convolutional code" (Expand search), "coder coding varying convolutional code" (Expand search), "coder coding improving convolutional codes" (Expand search), "coder coding improving convolutional and" (Expand search), "coder coding improving convolucional cnn" (Expand search), "coder boosting improving convolutional code" (Expand search), "coder codegen improving convolutional code" (Expand search), "coder coexist improving convolutional code" (Expand search), "modern coding improving convolutional code" (Expand search), "color coding improving convolutional code" (Expand search), "odor coding improving convolutional code" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding improving convolutional code") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding improving convolutional code\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding improving convolutional code ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding improving convolutional code") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.