Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding has parallel programming" » "modern coding has parallel programming" (Expand search), "color coding has parallel programming" (Expand search), "odor coding has parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coding fast parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coding gap parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coding hpc parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coding rnas parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coding an parallel programming" (Expand search), "coder coding at parallel programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding has parallel programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding has parallel programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding has parallel programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding has parallel programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.