Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding functions revisited programming" » "coder coding functions website programming" (Expand search), "coder coding functions definite programming" (Expand search), "coder coding functions oriented programming" (Expand search), "coder coding function revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder coding functions related programming" (Expand search), "coder coding functions review programming" (Expand search), "coder scoring functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder voting functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder coping function revisited programming" (Expand search), "modern coding functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "color coding functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "odor coding functions revisited programming" (Expand search)
"python in python python programming" » "python in pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python in piton python programming" (Expand search), "python in pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python and python python programming" (Expand search), "python _ python python programming" (Expand search), "python of python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding functions revisited programming\") OR (\"python in python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding functions revisited programming ) OR ( python in python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding functions revisited programming") OR ("python in python python programming"))*.