Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding function revisited programming" » "coder coding function website programming" (Expand search), "coder coding function definite programming" (Expand search), "coder coding function oriented programming" (Expand search), "coder coding condition revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder coding functions revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder coping function revisited programming" (Expand search), "coder crowding function revisited programming" (Expand search), "modern coding function revisited programming" (Expand search), "color coding function revisited programming" (Expand search), "odor coding function revisited programming" (Expand search)
"python using python python programming" » "python using pythons python programming" (Expand search), "python using piton python programming" (Expand search), "python using pitons python programming" (Expand search), "python usando python python programming" (Expand search), "python coding python python programming" (Expand search), "action using python python programming" (Expand search), "python in python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding function revisited programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding function revisited programming\") OR (\"python using python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding function revisited programming ) OR ( python using python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding function revisited programming") OR ("python using python python programming"))*.