Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding function predicts in" » "coder coding function prediction in" (Expand search), "coder coding functional predictions in" (Expand search), "coder coding functional prediction in" (Expand search), "coder coding functions predicts in" (Expand search), "coder coping function predicts in" (Expand search), "coder crowding function predicts in" (Expand search), "modern coding function predicts in" (Expand search), "color coding function predicts in" (Expand search), "odor coding function predicts in" (Expand search), "coder coding function predict in" (Expand search), "coder coding function predictors in" (Expand search), "coder coding function predicates in" (Expand search)
"api python python python programming" » "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "rpa python python python programming" (Expand search), "manim python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding function predicts in") OR ("api python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding function predicts in\") OR (\"api python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding function predicts in ) OR ( api python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding function predicts in") OR ("api python python python programming"))*.