Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding function precedes programmers" » "coder coding function provides programmers" (Expand search), "coder coding function predicts programmers" (Expand search), "coder coding function provokes programmers" (Expand search), "coder coding functions precedes programmers" (Expand search), "coder coping function precedes programmers" (Expand search), "coder crowding function precedes programmers" (Expand search), "modern coding function precedes programmers" (Expand search), "color coding function precedes programmers" (Expand search), "odor coding function precedes programmers" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding function precedes programmers\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding function precedes programmers ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding function precedes programmers") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.