Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding frame dependency programming" » "coder coding frame dependent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding frame independent programming" (Expand search), "coder coding frame dependent reprogramming" (Expand search), "coder coding frame dependence programming" (Expand search), "coder coding rate dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder coding game dependency programming" (Expand search), "modern coding frame dependency programming" (Expand search), "color coding frame dependency programming" (Expand search), "odor coding frame dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder moving frame dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder comoving frame dependency programming" (Expand search), "coder reading frame dependency programming" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding frame dependency programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding frame dependency programming\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding frame dependency programming ) OR ( via python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding frame dependency programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.