Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding failed learning programming" » "coder coding failed learning programme" (Expand search), "coder coding failed teaching programming" (Expand search), "coder coding failed learning program" (Expand search), "coder coding aided learning programming" (Expand search), "coder coding tailored learning programming" (Expand search), "coder coding flipped learning programming" (Expand search), "coder coding enabled learning programming" (Expand search), "coder coding based learning programming" (Expand search), "modern coding failed learning programming" (Expand search), "color coding failed learning programming" (Expand search), "odor coding failed learning programming" (Expand search)
"and python python python programming" » "and pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "and piton python python programming" (Expand search), "and pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "api python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding failed learning programming\") OR (\"and python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding failed learning programming ) OR ( and python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding failed learning programming") OR ("and python python python programming"))*.