Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding exact logarithmic functions" » "coder coding exact logarithmic function" (Expand search), "coder coding and logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding dual logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "modern coding exact logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "color coding exact logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "odor coding exact logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder finding exact logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder coding at logarithmic functions" (Expand search), "coder chain exact logarithmic functions" (Expand search)
"_ pythons python python programming" » "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding exact logarithmic functions") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding exact logarithmic functions\") OR (\"_ pythons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding exact logarithmic functions ) OR ( _ pythons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding exact logarithmic functions") OR ("_ pythons python python programming"))*.