Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding efficiency on programming" » "coder feeding efficiency on programming" (Expand search), "coder cutting efficiency on programming" (Expand search), "coder spending efficiency on programming" (Expand search), "coder coding efficiency in programming" (Expand search), "coder coding efficiency cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coding efficiency and programming" (Expand search), "coder coding efficiency of programming" (Expand search), "coder coding efficiency _ programming" (Expand search), "modern coding efficiency on programming" (Expand search), "color coding efficiency on programming" (Expand search), "odor coding efficiency on programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ python python pythin programming" (Expand search), "_ python python pythcone programming" (Expand search), "_ python python pythand programming" (Expand search), "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding efficiency on programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding efficiency on programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding efficiency on programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.