Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding discourse's logical programming" » "coder coding discourse's dialogical programming" (Expand search), "coder coding discourse dialogical programming" (Expand search), "coder coding discourse local programming" (Expand search), "coder coding discourse's logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coding discourse's physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coding discourse's goal programming" (Expand search), "coder crossing discourses logical programming" (Expand search), "coder calling discourses logical programming" (Expand search), "coder eating discourses logical programming" (Expand search), "modern coding discourse's logical programming" (Expand search), "color coding discourse's logical programming" (Expand search), "odor coding discourse's logical programming" (Expand search)
"via python python python programming" » "via pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "via piton python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding discourse's logical programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding discourse's logical programming\") OR (\"via python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding discourse's logical programming ) OR ( via python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding discourse's logical programming") OR ("via python python python programming"))*.