Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding dependent logical programming" » "coder coding dependent logic programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent physical programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependence logical programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent local programming" (Expand search), "coder becoming dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "coder sliding dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "coder smoking dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "modern coding dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "color coding dependent logical programming" (Expand search), "odor coding dependent logical programming" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding dependent logical programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding dependent logical programming\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding dependent logical programming ) OR ( _ python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding dependent logical programming") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.