Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding dependent cross coverage" » "coder becoming dependent cross coverage" (Expand search), "coder sliding dependent cross coverage" (Expand search), "coder smoking dependent cross coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent gross coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent loss coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent chronic coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent crops coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent grosso coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent press coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding dependent cross coverage" (Expand search), "color coding dependent cross coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding dependent cross coverage" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding dependent cross coverage\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding dependent cross coverage ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding dependent cross coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.