Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding dependent code coverage" » "coder becoming dependent code coverage" (Expand search), "coder sliding dependent code coverage" (Expand search), "coder smoking dependent code coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent model coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent codon coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent case coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent care coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent and coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent the coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding dependent code coverage" (Expand search), "color coding dependent code coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding dependent code coverage" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding dependent code coverage\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding dependent code coverage ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding dependent code coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))*.