Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding dependency based programming" » "coder coping dependency based programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependent based programming" (Expand search), "coder growing dependency based programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependency and programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependency based program" (Expand search), "coder coding dependency cone programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependence based programming" (Expand search), "coder coding dependencia baseada programming" (Expand search), "modern coding dependency based programming" (Expand search), "color coding dependency based programming" (Expand search), "odor coding dependency based programming" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding dependency based programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding dependency based programming\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding dependency based programming ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding dependency based programming") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.