Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding decoding time functionally" » "coder coding decoding the functionally" (Expand search), "coder coding decoding time functional" (Expand search), "coder coding decoding in functionally" (Expand search), "coder encoding decoding time functionally" (Expand search), "coder reading decoding time functionally" (Expand search), "coder joint decoding time functionally" (Expand search), "coder coding coding time functionally" (Expand search), "coder coding deboning time functionally" (Expand search), "modern coding decoding time functionally" (Expand search), "color coding decoding time functionally" (Expand search), "odor coding decoding time functionally" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding decoding time functionally\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding decoding time functionally ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding decoding time functionally") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.