Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding decoding cnn's coverage" » "coder encoding decoding cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "coder reading decoding cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "coder joint decoding cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding decoding news coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding decoding cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "color coding decoding cnn's coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding decoding cnn's coverage" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding decoding cnn's coverage") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding decoding cnn's coverage\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding decoding cnn's coverage ) OR ( in python python python programming ))*.