Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding decisions when explanation" » "coder voting decisions when explanation" (Expand search), "coder binding decisions when explanation" (Expand search), "coder hedging decisions when explanation" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions the explanation" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions when exploration" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions an explanation" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions in explanation" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions on explanation" (Expand search), "modern coding decisions when explanation" (Expand search), "color coding decisions when explanation" (Expand search), "odor coding decisions when explanation" (Expand search)
"via pitons python python programming" » "via pitons pythons python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons piton python programming" (Expand search), "via pitons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "via citons python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitoni python python programming" (Expand search), "via pitoes python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding decisions when explanation") OR ("via pitons python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding decisions when explanation\") OR (\"via pitons python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding decisions when explanation ) OR ( via pitons python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding decisions when explanation") OR ("via pitons python python programming"))*.