Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding deciding when detecting" » "coder coding decoding when detecting" (Expand search), "coder encoding decoding when detecting" (Expand search), "coder reading decoding when detecting" (Expand search), "coder coding deciding when selecting" (Expand search), "coder coding deciding when detection" (Expand search), "coder coding deciding when reflecting" (Expand search), "coder coding deciding the detecting" (Expand search), "coder coding defining when detecting" (Expand search), "coder coding decisions when detecting" (Expand search), "modern coding deciding when detecting" (Expand search), "color coding deciding when detecting" (Expand search), "odor coding deciding when detecting" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding deciding when detecting\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding deciding when detecting ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding deciding when detecting") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.