Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding coding to status" » "coder coding decoding to status" (Expand search), "coder coding using to status" (Expand search), "coder coding canine to status" (Expand search), "modern coding coding to status" (Expand search), "color coding coding to status" (Expand search), "odor coding coding to status" (Expand search), "coder coding acording to status" (Expand search), "coder coding bonding to status" (Expand search), "coder coding coding to state" (Expand search), "coder coding coding to statin" (Expand search), "coder coding coding to static" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding coding to status") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding coding to status\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding coding to status ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding coding to status") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.