Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding coding time waste" » "coder coding decoding time waste" (Expand search), "coder coding using time waste" (Expand search), "coder coding canine time waste" (Expand search), "modern coding coding time waste" (Expand search), "color coding coding time waste" (Expand search), "odor coding coding time waste" (Expand search), "coder coding holding time waste" (Expand search), "coder coding loading time waste" (Expand search), "coder coding coding the waste" (Expand search), "coder coding coding lime waste" (Expand search), "coder coding coding timber waste" (Expand search), "coder coding coding mine waste" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding coding time waste") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding coding time waste\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding coding time waste ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding coding time waste") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.