Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding coding loss method" » "coder coding decoding loss method" (Expand search), "coder coding using loss method" (Expand search), "coder coding canine loss method" (Expand search), "modern coding coding loss method" (Expand search), "color coding coding loss method" (Expand search), "odor coding coding loss method" (Expand search), "coder coding cooking loss method" (Expand search), "coder coding coding locus method" (Expand search), "coder coding coding loop method" (Expand search), "coder coding coding class method" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding coding loss method") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding coding loss method\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding coding loss method ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding coding loss method") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.