Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding coding line sample" » "coder coding decoding line sample" (Expand search), "coder coding using line sample" (Expand search), "coder coding canine line sample" (Expand search), "modern coding coding line sample" (Expand search), "color coding coding line sample" (Expand search), "odor coding coding line sample" (Expand search), "coder coding coping line sample" (Expand search), "coder coding coating line sample" (Expand search), "coder coding coding in sample" (Expand search), "coder coding coding wine samples" (Expand search), "coder coding coding urine sample" (Expand search), "coder coding coding urine samples" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding coding line sample\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding coding line sample ) OR ( in python python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding coding line sample") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.