Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"syntactic features python python programming" » "synthetic features python python programming" (Expand search), "semantic features python python programming" (Expand search), "dynamic features python python programming" (Expand search), "syntactic features pythons python programming" (Expand search), "syntactic features piton python programming" (Expand search), "syntactic features pitons python programming" (Expand search)
"coder coding coding java programming" » "coder coding coding and programming" (Expand search), "coder coding coding based programming" (Expand search), "coder coding coding goal programming" (Expand search), "coder coding decoding java programming" (Expand search), "coder coding using java programming" (Expand search), "coder coding canine java programming" (Expand search), "modern coding coding java programming" (Expand search), "color coding coding java programming" (Expand search), "odor coding coding java programming" (Expand search), "coder coding codigo java programming" (Expand search), "coder coding coding av1 programming" (Expand search), "coder coding coding data programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding coding java programming") OR ("syntactic features python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding coding java programming\") OR (\"syntactic features python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding coding java programming ) OR ( syntactic features python python programming ))*.