Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding coding are effective" » "coder coding decoding are effective" (Expand search), "coder coding using are effective" (Expand search), "coder coding canine are effective" (Expand search), "coder coding coding more effective" (Expand search), "coder coding coding the effective" (Expand search), "modern coding coding are effective" (Expand search), "color coding coding are effective" (Expand search), "odor coding coding are effective" (Expand search), "coder coding coping are effective" (Expand search), "coder coding coding and effective" (Expand search)
"in python python python programming" » "in pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ python python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding coding are effective") OR ("in python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding coding are effective\") OR (\"in python python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding coding are effective ) OR ( in python python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding coding are effective") OR ("in python python python programming"))*.