Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding by decreasing programming" » "coder coding by learning programming" (Expand search), "coder coding by creation programming" (Expand search), "coder coding by developing programming" (Expand search), "coder coding by increasing programming" (Expand search), "modern coding by decreasing programming" (Expand search), "color coding by decreasing programming" (Expand search), "odor coding by decreasing programming" (Expand search), "coder loading by decreasing programming" (Expand search), "coder coding _ decreasing programming" (Expand search), "coder coding of decreasing programming" (Expand search)
"api pitoes python python programming" » "api pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "api piton python python programming" (Expand search), "api pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes pythons python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes piton python programming" (Expand search), "api pitoes pitons python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding by decreasing programming") OR ("api pitoes python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding by decreasing programming\") OR (\"api pitoes python python programming\"))".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding by decreasing programming ) OR ( api pitoes python python programming )).
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding by decreasing programming") OR ("api pitoes python python programming"))*.