Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding bound algorithmic skeleton" » "coder coding bound algorithmic skeletons" (Expand search), "coder coding bound algorithm selection" (Expand search), "coder coding bound algorithm skeleton" (Expand search), "coder coding bound algorithms skeleton" (Expand search), "coder coding and algorithmic skeleton" (Expand search), "modern coding bound algorithmic skeleton" (Expand search), "color coding bound algorithmic skeleton" (Expand search), "odor coding bound algorithmic skeleton" (Expand search), "coder coding based algorithmic skeleton" (Expand search), "coder coding on algorithmic skeleton" (Expand search)
"in pythons python python programming" » "in pitons python python programming" (Expand search), "in piton python python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons piton python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pitons python programming" (Expand search), "in pythons pytm python programming" (Expand search), "in python python python programming" (Expand search), "on python python python programming" (Expand search), "in pybthon python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding bound algorithmic skeleton\") OR (\"in pythons python python programming\"))~".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding bound algorithmic skeleton ) OR ( in pythons python python programming ))~.
• Adding a wildcard symbol may retrieve word variants: (("coder coding bound algorithmic skeleton") OR ("in pythons python python programming"))*.