Perhaps you should try some spelling variations:
"coder coding based function coverage" » "coder coding based functional coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding based election coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding based functional beverage" (Expand search), "coder coding based functions coverage" (Expand search), "coder coding base function coverage" (Expand search), "modern coding based function coverage" (Expand search), "color coding based function coverage" (Expand search), "odor coding based function coverage" (Expand search), "coder coating based function coverage" (Expand search), "coder modeling based function coverage" (Expand search), "coder reading based function coverage" (Expand search)
"_ python python python programming" » "_ pythons python python programming" (Expand search), "_ piton python python programming" (Expand search), "_ pitons python python programming" (Expand search)

You may be able to get more results by adjusting your search query.

• Performing a fuzzy search may retrieve terms with similar spellings: (("coder coding based function coverage") OR ("_ python python python programming"))~.
• The words AND, OR and NOT may confuse the search; try adding quotes: "((\"coder coding based function coverage\") OR (\"_ python python python programming\"))*".
• Removing quotes may allow a broader search: (( coder coding based function coverage ) OR ( _ python python python programming ))*.